![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Downloads | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | Webmaster Resources | Webmaster Blogs |
![]() UK Web Hosting |
![]() Website Hosting |
![]() UK One Way |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||||
|
We all know "Quality over Quantity" rules in IBL (Incoming Back Links).
But I want to say that as long as those “Quantity” links are not from "bad neighborhoods" and are semi-relevant - take them. Of course, select and pay for quality IBLs, but don't discount "any old links" too hastily. |
|
||||
|
I assume by "Quality back links" you mean from high PR site. They come with a no follow tag - say wikipedia, digg, SU, twitter etc - thanks to G - and "Buying" links is penalized - so how does a webmaster increase his PR if he doesnt have quality content!
__________________
|
|
|||||
|
I believe and quality and quantity. I don't even concern myself with links from lesser sites, if they happen they happen...
Evan |
|
||||
|
Quote:
If you don't have quality content then you don't deserve to increase your PR. Matt Cutts wrote this very same thing many moons ago although he said it much more eloquently than me. ![]() |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Providing you have decent content, then you will compliment and grow together (or so I've found). And it's surprisingly easy to find good quality relevant links. ![]()
__________________
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'm not sure about the "easy to find good quality relevant links" bit though, I find it really hard! It's easy to find good quality sites but how do you get them to link to you? Care to share any tips? ![]() |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Webmaster Resources |
| • UK Web Hosting • UK WW SEO Tools • Free site submission • Web Directory |
| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Site Of the Month |
![]() Nominate site of the month |
|
|
| UK Webmaster World Forums - Internet marketing, web development, domain names, SEO contest and discussuons. |
| Subscribe to our feeds |