Joomla - How does it compare with other CMS

[incognito]

This post is part of a Joomla article package that I hope will be informative to those who are new to Joomla which hopefully Joomla experts can help enhance.

Open Source software and commercial software are different in various aspects. Cost being the primary differentiator may play a vital role in your choice of a CMS. Open source CMS comes at no or marginal cost while Commercial Software are relatively higher priced.

It is generally believed that the commercial CMS provide better post-installation assistance in documentation, training, stability, security issues etc. as their support staff may be available when needed. This may not be possible in open source CMS which primarily runs on the support of volunteers and not regular staff. However, Joomla! is a pleasant exception!. With thousands of developers on the project, it has built a reputation for its prompt and effective customer service. Moreover, with a strong volunteer-base, Joomla! can boast of continual development resulting in timely upgrades and new releases.

You may look at your specific CMS requirements, business conditions, available resources and client requirements while choosing a CMS. Factors like price; implementation; documentation, training and support services and customization opportunities should not be overlooked.

Some of the Free and Open Source CMS include – Joomla!, Mambo, Drupal, PHPNuke, Post Nuke, Plone, TYPO3, e107, Open CMS, MODx CMS, WordPress, XOOPS and Zope.

Some of the Commercial Software include – Vignette, Alfresco, RedDot CMS, Interwoven Teamsite, Tridion, Microsoft CMS, Oracle portal, Immediacy CMS, GOSS iCM, Hot Banana and Fatwire Content Server.

Comparing Joomla! with other open source CMS

Joomla! is comparable to most leading CMS systems in terms of its features. There are some features in Joomla! which Drupal, Plone and TYPO3 only offer as free add-on, examples of such features are job posting, guest book, chat etc.

All open source CMS are distributed under GNU GPL and may gel well with any of the operating systems. What sets Joomla! apart from the others is a strong developer community. This reflects in its highly efficient and consistent development program. The following chart tries to compare leading open source CMS based on a few important parameters.



As compared to open source CMS like Joomla!, commercial CMS are distributed under commercial or proprietary licenses. They may use diverse databases but Oracle and Microsoft SQL server are common. Also the programming language they use varies a lot. This includes PHP, Java, Java Script, .NET, XML, XSL, JSP, Perl, etc. Unlike open source CMS like Joomla!, commercial CMS may require specific operating systems for implementation. Vignette prefers Windows XP/2000/2003 while Oracle supports Windows, UNIX and LINUX. Like Joomla!, the web servers Apache and IIS are common in commercial CMS also.

Other than these technical specifications, there are many other factors for comparison. Features, built-in applications, support, commerce, flexibility, interoperability, management, performance, ease of use, security, etc are just some of them. Joomla! scores high on all of those parameters. Its growing popularity just underlines this fact.

[prazgod]

Joomla! and Mambo provide an in-built contact management application and captcha (for challenge-response test)

That is factually incorrect.

As one of the founding developers of Mambo, and now a full time Joomla Expert - I can assure you that there is no CAPTCHA in Joomla 1.0.14 and Mambo 4.5+

[temi]

Thanks for your correction prazgod, how can I verify that you are who you claim to be? would you be kind enough to send me a PM or with some info I could use to confirm your id?

Thanks

[prazgod]

No need to PM you - happy to do this in public.

My Name is Phil Taylor of Joomla! Extensions by Phil Taylor for Joomla 1.5 and Joomla 1.0.13 - Home

You can check the credits of Mambo and Joomla and you will see my name listed.

"prazgod" was my cvs commit name in Mambo 4.5 days and continues to be my "online handle" - you can check my joomla.org profile and mamboserver.com profiles...
Login
The Engagement Of Phil Taylor and Trevena Monks - Mambo - A PHP & MySQL Content Management System

Edit: The above links changed when I posted them!!

Edit: Also Joomla does not have "thousands of developers on the project" - there are thousands of 3rd Party developers developing plugins for Joomla - but only a few Joomla Core DEvelopers: The list is here:
http://joomlacode.org/gf/project/joomla/

[temi]

Parazgod, thanks for the clarification, I appreciate it very much The factual error you corrected has now been updated.

[r0ver]

Hello

There's a comparison between mambo and plone in:
Mambo, Lenya and Plone CMS: a comparison — Menttes it's a little bit old but main stuff should be still valid.