MSN Search To Share Advertising Revenue With Users?

MSN Search To Share Advertising Revenue With Users?

Bill Gates was speaking crazy talk last week during a trip to India when he eluded that MSN Search may be sharing advertising revenue with its users (isn’t that the iWon business plan?). According to the San Franscisco Examiner, Gates hinted that MSN Search may be looking to share the wealth with its users; “When you use a search engine, if somebody is making lot of money from advertisers they ought to share it with you,’’ Gates said during a business interview with Indian news channel NDTV Profit.

In a swipe at Google Inc. (GOOG), the world’s most-used Internet search engine, Gates said Microsoft’s search products may eventually give users software programs or even cash after they click on an advertisement.

Come to think of it, this revenue sharing crazy talk is not such a bad idea, however, I would not agree with sharing based upon clicks on search advertising. Doing so would lead to disgruntled advertisers and a new, higher plain of click fraud beyond the 3rd tier and bottom feeder search community and onto the web’s 3rd most popular search service. Instead, a points system based upon searches which lead to measureable actions on websites or percentages of product purchases gifted back to the consumer by MSN.

Just imagine, MSN assigns each registered consumer an ID which builds up points one can use in MSN Shopping in the same way that frequent flyer miles are managed. Come to think of it, a partnership with Star Alliance or a domestic carrier would be a nice into to the MSN Search Points system as the MSN Search Points could be used to build discounts at partnered flights, gas pumps, hotels and supermarkets. In addition, MSN member search oriented purchases could also be tracked, with MSN issuing a percent back on MSN Search driven web purchases.

Question is, just how much is a new loyal search user worth to MSN? Greg Sterling of the Kelsey Group looked into this question last March : “According to data released by Nielsen//NetRatings, as reported in AdWeek, MSN’s new broad consumer marketing campaign has seemed to drive some usage growth. According to Nielsen, MSN’s search market share grew 1.4 percent from 12.8 percent to 14.2 percent in the previous month. The apparent cost of that growth has been MSN’s US$150 million, spent on high-profile TV broadcasts such as the Super Bowl, as well as other media.“

Ok, let’s due the math. According to the US Census Population Clock there are currently 297,860,662 Americans. With about 140,000,000 active Internet users in the United States.

Microsoft spent $150,000,000 last January to boost MSN Search a 1.5% hike in the search market share, roughly 2,100,000 US users. For each new user that MSN Search gained from the advertising campaign, MSN Search paid roughly $72 per new search engine user. Give or take a few percentage points do to user drop off, it’s safe to say that MSN Search would pay $75 a month for a loyal search user.

So, if Microsoft would send you a check for $75 every month, would you use their search engine atleast once a day to find information?

Source: searchenginejournal.com/index.php?p=2649

[temi]

I like this, its a earn while you search, better than adsense any day

[Paul_KY]

Dumb idea. People will abuse it. Advertisers won't see a good ROI. They'll/I'll leave.

Stupid idea, Bill. Nix it.

[temi]

Your are righ about some thing Paul not all of it, lets see if they go ahead with the idea and how it evolves.

[Paul_KY]

Won't this attract the PTC/PTR crowd?

I mean, just look at 'em: getpaidforums.com They're drooling over a $3 paypal payment they received after two weeks of clicking. lol Yes, there REALLY are people in the world who have nothing else to do in life, so they sit behind their PC's and click, click, click away.

this could backfire - makes msn look like one of those looser paid email and paid search schemes. might just take off though.

Nice to see google keeping msn on its toes, as soon as one engine beats the other there will be little benefit for consumers.