 |

07-05-2008, 08:42 AM
|
 |
Boss Cart consultant
1115 posts this year. Platinum VIP!Trusted Member - This user is a Master!
Last months UKWW Tokens: 8
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Veszprém, Hungary
Posts: 1,600
Thanks: 4
Thanked 49 Times in 13 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
|
|
Sitemap question
Hey Guys,
i have a very nice question. So i have a sitemap.xml file uploaded to mydomain.com/sitemap.xml URL. I don't want to submit it to GWT or Yahoo! Site Explorer so i decide to add this line to my robots.txt
Code:
Sitemap: <http://mydomain.com/sitemap.xml>
Theoritically this must substitute submitting the site into the different webmaster services.
What do you think could it be effective solution?
Thank you
|

07-05-2008, 08:56 AM
|
 |
Facilitator
5166 posts this year. Platinum VIP!Trusted Member - This user is a Master!
Last months UKWW Tokens: 283
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London, England.
Posts: 11,929
Thanks: 3
Thanked 29 Times in 20 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
|
|
Zoli,
Where did this idea that the above code o robots.txt will substitute adding site map to Google webmaster tool?
|

07-05-2008, 10:51 AM
|
 |
Boss Cart consultant
1115 posts this year. Platinum VIP!Trusted Member - This user is a Master!
Last months UKWW Tokens: 8
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Veszprém, Hungary
Posts: 1,600
Thanks: 4
Thanked 49 Times in 13 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
|
|
Temi, i faced a technical problem during testing the xml sitemap builder script so i tried to find out the cause of the issue at sitemaps.org - Home website. I accidenatally find this guide about the mentioned solution.
I was very happy because it would make shopkeeper's life easier if she/he don't need to deal with website verification, and sitemap submission.
|

07-05-2008, 11:02 AM
|
 |
Facilitator
5166 posts this year. Platinum VIP!Trusted Member - This user is a Master!
Last months UKWW Tokens: 283
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London, England.
Posts: 11,929
Thanks: 3
Thanked 29 Times in 20 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
|
|
Its an interesting resource, I see your point about making shopkeeper's life easier. Once Google found the site map via robots.txt file, I take it it will update the site map option in GWT?
|

07-05-2008, 11:27 AM
|
 |
Boss Cart consultant
1115 posts this year. Platinum VIP!Trusted Member - This user is a Master!
Last months UKWW Tokens: 8
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Veszprém, Hungary
Posts: 1,600
Thanks: 4
Thanked 49 Times in 13 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
|
|
Temi, Google MSN and Yahoo! have agreed to use a certain sitemap protocol, which is published at sitemap.org. At google webmaster faq page i read this
Quote:
|
Google adheres to Sitemap Protocol 0.9 as dictated by sitemaps.org. Sitemaps created for Google using Sitemap Protocol 0.9 are therefore compatible with other search engines that adopt the standards of sitemaps.org
|
This suggest me that google accept robots.txt as compass concerning the location of sitemap. I guess one of the main advantages of submitting sitemap, the feedback about possible crawling or network error will be lost, but it must improve the visibility of a certain website. I have thinking this further and faceed another problem. If the script is installed into a subfolder there will be some programming issue, because the sitamap will be accessible at mydomain.com/subfolder/sitemap.xml, but the robots.txt must be placed to mydomain.com/robots.txt. Yes, it is still not a huge problem, but if the robots.txt already exist the script should only modify that with an additional line, but if the mydomain.com/sitemap.xml or mydomain.com/sitemap.xml.gz already exist the script must modify the robots.txt listing the two sitemaps
Quote:
Sitemap: <http://mydomain.com/subfolder/sitemap.xml>
Sitemap: <http://mydomain.com/sitemap.xml>
|
.
The main question is in my mind now is the following:
Would a shopkeeper in the age of 30-50 spend any minute to verify the site and get acquainted with WT or we should solve this providing the maximal benefit, but automatically.
What do you think Temi?
|

07-05-2008, 12:28 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
184 posts this year. Executive spud! We have not managed to scare them away..
Last months UKWW Tokens: 15
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 172
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
|
|
i have added a line in robots.txt like :
Sitemap: http://www.theseoservicesindia.com/sitemap.xml
It works fine. Google has crawled all my pages
|

07-05-2008, 05:21 PM
|
 |
Facilitator
5166 posts this year. Platinum VIP!Trusted Member - This user is a Master!
Last months UKWW Tokens: 283
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London, England.
Posts: 11,929
Thanks: 3
Thanked 29 Times in 20 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
|
|
Zoli,
I think we should just provide site map, verify it using GWT to make sure it has been programmed very well. We will list it as part of the features, its up to shop keeper to take advantage of it or ignore it. The google site map is an advanced feature for Boss Cart premium owners who are SEO savvvy or their webmasters.
I will not worry too much about the complicated issues you raised, we can just put all this in the documentation and if any user have issue with it, he or she can contact us and we will guide him through.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagi Zoltán
Temi, Google MSN and Yahoo! have agreed to use a certain sitemap protocol, which is published at sitemap.org. At google webmaster faq page i read this
This suggest me that google accept robots.txt as compass concerning the location of sitemap. I guess one of the main advantages of submitting sitemap, the feedback about possible crawling or network error will be lost, but it must improve the visibility of a certain website. I have thinking this further and faceed another problem. If the script is installed into a subfolder there will be some programming issue, because the sitamap will be accessible at mydomain.com/subfolder/sitemap.xml, but the robots.txt must be placed to mydomain.com/robots.txt. Yes, it is still not a huge problem, but if the robots.txt already exist the script should only modify that with an additional line, but if the mydomain.com/sitemap.xml or mydomain.com/sitemap.xml.gz already exist the script must modify the robots.txt listing the two sitemaps
.
The main question is in my mind now is the following:
Would a shopkeeper in the age of 30-50 spend any minute to verify the site and get acquainted with WT or we should solve this providing the maximal benefit, but automatically.
What do you think Temi?
|
|

07-05-2008, 09:11 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
223 posts this year. worth their weight in gold! Trusted Member - And full of good stuff!
Last months UKWW Tokens: 9
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 168
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
|
|
I think it's best to include it in your robots.txt file and also keep update on google webmaster and yahoo, msn etc... It's good to have it in the robots.txt for search engines that don't have webmaster back ends yet like Ask.
|

07-08-2008, 04:10 AM
|
 |
Member
41 posts this year. i see smoke! It looks like they have moved their luggage in.
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 40
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
|
|
well, if you're site's structure is well done and you have enough links, you don't need a sitemap ...
|

07-08-2008, 04:12 AM
|
 |
Facilitator
5166 posts this year. Platinum VIP!Trusted Member - This user is a Master!
Last months UKWW Tokens: 283
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London, England.
Posts: 11,929
Thanks: 3
Thanked 29 Times in 20 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
|
|
well it depends... if you have a simple site, you don't need a site map but if its a large complex site, you certainly need it to get all the pages crawled.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LinkPopularity
well, if you're site's structure is well done and you have enough links, you don't need a sitemap ...
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|
|